Several speakers urged church members to put instrumental music into the category of disputable matters, likening it to disagreements over Sunday school and individual communion cups.
The presidents of ACU, a 5,000-student university associated with a cappella churches of Christ, and Milligan College, a 1,000-student liberal arts college associated with instrumental Christian Churches, opened the Lectureship with a joint theme lecture.
ACU
President Royce Money noted that the university was founded in 1906, the same
year — coincidentally — that a federal religious census first reported the a
cappella and instrumental churches as separate bodies.
“The
original purpose of our movement was to be nondenominational Christians only,”
Money said in a message on truth, grace and unity from the Gospel of John.
“After
a period of an unprecedented spirit of unity and mutual acceptance in the first
half of the 19th century, we certainly have had our share of conflicts and
divisions … especially in the decades following the Civil War,” the ACU
president said.
He
added: “But in this dawning of the 21st century, there is a renewed spirit of
unity among us — not for merging or for giving up long-held religious
convictions that historically have divided us. Rather, it is a spirit of
fellowship, of conversation, of reconciliation between estranged brothers and
sisters.”
While
church scholars disagree on whether the Bible allows only a cappella singing,
the Lectureship underscored the fact that many members are re-evaluating the
issue. Even steadfast opponents of instrumental music acknowledge that.
“There
is, of course, no question that many in churches of Christ no longer believe
that instrumental music is in any real sense wrong,” said Cecil May, dean of
the Bible college at Faulkner University in Montgomery, Ala. “Of course, that
greatly changes all of the perceptions about the division at the turn of the
last century. Those differing perspectives, I have found, make meaningful
communication difficult.”
CALL
TO EMBRACE ‘TRUE SPIRIT OF UNITY’
Today,
the a cappella churches report about 1.3 million baptized members in the U.S., slightly
more than the instrumental churches’ 1.2 million. Both groups believe that
Jesus is Lord, baptize for remission of sins and offer the Lord’s Supper each
Sunday. Money suggested that fellowships sharing those traits must heed Jesus’
prayer for unity.
“I
would humbly suggest that those of us who claim to be heirs of the glory of
God, who claim to know a little bit about restoring New Testament Christianity
in a fallen world, begin by asking God and asking each other for forgiveness
for the messes we have made,” Money said. “Then we need to open the Scriptures
together and let the one who is full of grace and truth teach us again the true
spirit of unity.”
Milligan
College President Don Jeanes addressed the split of 1906 less directly.
But
he said: “You and I are brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ, and we share this
truth and this grace. And in turn, we share a common purpose, and as God’s
people, we need to live it, we need to share it, and we need to show it. We
need to take it to an unsaved world because that’s the light that has come into
the world.”
Money
expressed doubt that many people have looked at Restoration Movement churches
over the last 100 years and said, “Behold, how they love one another.”
“But
we’re going to do better in the next 100 years, and we’re going to do better
beginning right now,” he said to cheers.
Along
with the joint theme lecture by Money and Jeanes, the Lectureship hosted a
three-day Restoration Forum featuring eight panelists from a cappella and
instrumental churches. Among the panelists were the ministers of each
fellowship’s largest congregation: Rick Atchley of the 6,400-member Richland
Hills Church of Christ in Fort Worth, Texas, and Bob Russell of the 18,000-member Southeast
Christian Church in Louisville,
Ky.
Differing
views on how to handle the silence of Scripture on certain issues have
contributed to the division, Atchley said.
“Where
the Bible speaks, we speak,” he said, referring to a cappella churches. “And
where the Bible is silent, we have even more to say.”
A
person in a primitive hut in Africa could read
the New Testament and determine that baptism is necessary for remission of sins
and that God’s people should sing praises, Atchley said. “And they’ll probably
get out their drums and beat them when they sing, and they’ll never for a
moment think they’re wrong,” he said.
‘HIGH
VIEW OF SCRIPTURE’
Russell
stressed that independent Christian
Churches parted from the
“increasingly liberal” Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in the mid-1920s.
“We
want you to understand that the leaders in the independent Christian Churches
have a high view of Scripture as the infallible word of God,” Russell said.
All
the panelists supported stronger ties between the two groups. That concerns
Howard Norton, a Bible professor and assistant dean for church relations at Harding University
in Searcy, Ark.
Focusing
on unity without substantive discussion of instrumental music represents a
doctrinal compromise, said Norton, who was honored the second night of the ACU
Lectureship -— along with his teammates — for mission work in Brazil in the
1960s and 1970s.
“I
think there is a very strong movement within our fellowship — the a cappella
church of Christ — to completely join up with the Christian Church and say that
what they are doing by introducing instrumental music, that there’s nothing
wrong with that,” Norton said.
Wayne
Newland, a member of the Greater Portland Church of Christ in Maine, said he appreciated several of the
Christian Church speakers complimenting a cappella singing.
“In discussing unity, there was no attempt to encourage us to use accompaniment,” Newland said. “All speakers focused on just accepting one another ‘across the keyboard.’”
April 1, 2006
Related Stories:
Full Story | Map | Related Stories | Comments
The Chronicle welcomes and encourages
feedback that promotes thoughtful and respectful discussion. Letters and comments should be 750 characters or less and may be edited for length or clarity. Comments to the print or online edition are considered to be letters to the editor and may be published.











