| Wednesday, April 16 2008 Rob Redden said: |
||
![]() |
My concern about this new rule allowing adult students (over 21) the right to drink alcohol beverages off campus is how it will impact the other students in class. Students who drink off campus may later attend either day or evening classes with liquor on their breath. This is a horrible experience for anyone but for young Christians sent to a Christian college to safeguard them from the evil influences of the world is a recipe for disaster for ACU. I pray this policy will be reconsidered and reversed. Rob Redden ![]() |
|
| Thursday, April 17 2008 Sharon Skinner said: |
||
![]() |
I attended a Christian University, and I sent one of my sons to a Christian University. If students decide to be foolish and drink off campus, no ruling by the University will stop them. It is useless for a University to have a rule it cannot enforce. Young Christians in this day and age are not so fragile that a fellow classmate with liquor on his breath will make them turn to drink. One of the greatest favors a Christian university can teach students is how to live in the REAL world. And that includes living with fellow Christians who make bad choices. I totally understand the reasoning behind this decision, and agree with it. ![]() |
|
| Thursday, April 17 2008 jason goldtrap said: |
||
![]() |
I seriously doubt this will affect anyone's behavior. Meaning, those who are over 21 and drink will continue to do so whether the rule exists or not. Equally, those under 21 will continue to drink and hope to not get caught. The fact that the current rule "was not enforceable and was unrealistic in its scope," is beyond the point. Rules, in an adult, responsible world that we deserve, should be followed because one respects the authority rather than one fears the consequence of the violation. My guess is ACU has a rule against fornication. There is no practical way to enforce that rule, however, it is still wise for it to be on the books. NOTHING is improved by relaxing standards. Aim high for that is where your Lord resides. ![]() |
|
| Friday, April 18 2008 Alison Rader said: |
||
![]() |
I am a 2001 graduate of ACU and I was somewhat surprised by the announcement that ACU would be revising its alcohol policy. I never had a problem with the policy, especially since someone who wanted the opportunity to drink in college could have simply gone to a state university at a third of the cost. I'm not really sure why ACU characterized the local media coverage of the rule change as "sensational." The story in the Abilene Reporter-News (written by 2004 ACU grad) said all the things Dr. Money's letter said, but in a more interesting and eloquent fashion. The reaction had nothing to do with the way the media covered the event; it had much more to do with the emotional reaction of alums and Abilene residents. I'm certain they realized this would be a controversial move; why blame the media? ![]() |
|
| Friday, April 18 2008 John Jenkins said: |
||
![]() |
As a well known philosopher said, "Stupid is as Stupid does. Twenty years ago when we took our son to a Christian University a friend of mine took his daughter to a state university and left her in a dormitory that along with its twin highrise was referred to as Sodom and Gommorah. Looks like some "Christian" Universities are on their way to their own Sodoms and Gommorahs. If I came to work with alcohol on my breath I would be sent home. If I was noticably drunk I would be tested and if found positive I would be fired. If I was found to be drinking on company time and company property I would be fired. Universities should prepare students for the real world, which university life is NOT. University leaders as well as many church leaders in a spirit of tolerance are failing everyone. You cannot serve two masters. University leaders must choose their master. ![]() |
|